so i fail to understand the basis behind the prejudice of this country.
but i have an idea.
people fear what they don't understand.
since people dont understand somebody elses desires, or actions, they condemn them, with no basis, without even giving it a second thought.
you see i would never do this. It has been said that people quarrel because they cannot argue. Shout blissful bouts of ignorance, because they have no facts to base their judgement upon. implying a point of view that without factual evidence.
people are so ignorant and selfish with their opinions, that they assume they need no basis here. "we are american, we have freedom of speech, we have democracy here, we have a right to express our opinions and our government has a right to listen. we are a free country and we govern ouselves!"
selfish spoiled america. i am ashamed to live here actually, in a country where the important issues such as war, poverty, homelessness and education, are pushed aside so that the government can tango with the legal right to govern peoples private lives.
you see, everybodys seems to be so outraged by our lack of children going to college, teen pregnancy, drug abuse etc. they get on the news it makes the papers, they rant and rave about taking care of the children, funding for college, developing programs to help those people in need.
but when you turn on the news, after a brief showing of homeless children, and a couple murders, a 2 hour long segment on how homosexuals suck and and they dont deserve any rights graces the presence of your television screen.
a bunch of 50 year old men who probably have had sex in about 26 yearsm and hideously unattractive women in plain black and blue suits, sit and ramble on about the "sanctity of a marriage" and men and women and unions and blah blah blah blah, insistent on convincing americans to abandon their right to choose and "fight for a constitutional amendment that would undermine one of the worlds most fundamental practices."
and then they hget to the children bit, because we all know that in order to raise a family, you have to be straight, living together, working, and religious because all children who dont grow up with married parents with a pict fence and a labrador retriever are damned, and my god a single mother? Fuck... she may as well give of now because women are too weak to raise children on their own. Better call Jhonny Cockren (or however you spell that).
not to undermine the benefits of a marriage to children. yes they are a good in eviroment in which to raise children. have a family . it is best for a child to grow up with two parents. I myself live with both my parents and have a very happy family.
but lets face it, thats not going to happen. men are going to abandon their children. women are going to be unfit mothers. all marriages are not going to last, and children are going to continue to grow up lack the "traditional american family". you cannot preserve society in such a way that would prevent this from happening.
however george w. bush seems to think so.
i fail to undertstand how my decision to marry another woman affects family values. we are dealing with two seperate issues here, gay marriage vs. gay parenting. these are two seperate arguments, yet the government is trying to make them one in the same, and use that as a way of attacking the marriage issue. FALLACY.
there is no basis behand that argument. just because i choose to marry another woman, does not mean we want kids. and if we dont want kids, in what way does our relationships threaten family values?
i want the reason i cannot marry the woman I love to be argued. not what it does to kids. this doesnt have anything to do with kids, this deals with 2 people who love each other, wanting to be with each other. PERIOD.
we will worry about the children later.
furthermore, i fail to understand how my decision to marry another woman affects anyone for that matter. oh i know, it doesnt. what i do in the privacy of my own home is my buisness, no body elses, not even the government. since when the the government have right to govern my private life?
were not talking about a federal offense here such as incest, since again ignorant spoiled americans seem to think that allowing gays to marry then must mean were going to allow people to marry their fathers.
to marry ones father creates so many problems within the genepool as well as interferes with the development of the family tree (ex. If a daughter has sex with her father and gets pregnant, the babies mother would also be her sister, and the babies father would also be her granfather, all sisters, would be aunts\sisters etc.) could cause all types of birth defects and is detrimentally harmful to any child that could come from that type of union.
so what do you have on gays?
tick tick tick...
not a damn thing. no defects. no interference. no more of a possibility of disease than anyone else who has unprotected sex or doesnt know their partners sexual history.
so why is the government so insistent on us not having this?
because people fear what they dont understand, and if they dont understand it, it must be wrong. Immoral rather, as bushie seems to think. because we all know that amending the constitution will protect marriage in its right. men an women will keep marrying and divoring, children will continue to grow up less of one parent and socielty itself will florish and be great!!
what a bunch of stupid fucks our U.S government are.
im no politician, im not even all that smart, but I do know the basics of freedom and independence. I do know about our COnsitution and its founding fathers, I do know what its intent was, and how it was supposed to be implemented...
and that intended implementation was not intended to be in a way that would single out a specific group of people and explicity DENY them rights under the federal law.
but to whose jurisdiction is this presented?
good ol bushie.
and because he thinks its wrong, it must be wrong, and god damnnit if you dont like believe it, he'll just make it so that the constitution says so!!
in my government class, my teacher told us that whenever we do not know the answer to a question regarding why a governmental policy or procedure is, there is one answer that will almost always be correct. know what it is?
"its in the constitution"
well folks , if things go bushies way, in the future why can't gays get married?
"its in the constitution"
it will be that fucking simple!
wow, what a "free" country we live in.
its sick. it really is.
its funny how the government gives the legal right for heavily racist groups like the KKK, legal permission to rally in public areas for their cause, and protects their right to do so
but in states like Lousiana, gay PDA's are outlawed(supposedly). SO we have a right to pubically be racist? but not the right to kiss the person we love?
im so annoyed.
perhaps when im older ill move to Canada.